Skip to main content

CAV'S SPRINT


Watching Cavendish at the Revolutions' meeting at the weekend was confirmation of my theory on his sprinting. He doesn't need a train to win a sprint. He shouldn't use a train to win a sprint.
Cavendish took the win on the last race by going from the front and even though he wasn't in his best form he managed to keep the other riders behind him...and on track. Sure enough he would have loved a few gears to shift up but he still rotated those legs at just the right cadence to cross the line first. 

At the Worlds he took the win despite, yes despite, Team GB's tactics. Yes I'm the only person in the world to think that but not ashamed to admit it and if Cav hadn't had that last kick, most would have to admit Team GB's tactics had been foolish.
They rode for everyone, not just Cav. Yes they kept the pace high but in staying at the front for so long they gave the other teams like Germany and Australia a chance in the sprint. Their train failed comprehensively when it counted and it nearly cost Cavendish the title. Geraint Thomas lost contact with Cav by either going too deep too soon and/or by Cav being boxed in and if it hadn't been for his sheer desire to grab the rainbow jersey today we would probably have an Australian champion.

His other most important win was at the "Monument" that is Milano-Sanremo. Cav went for it alone, chasing by himself a tiring effort by Haussler to beat him on the line by a whisker. Again no train there.
And he's had other wins where the train was not required. 

No doubt Zabel was the mastermind on the successful HighRoad/Columbia/HTC train. That's how most pure sprinters win. Like Petacchi, Cipollini before him, Farrar. But Cavendish is not everyone else. He is definitely special in the way he can pull away from the group at a speed nobody can match. He has proven to have a very good eye for positioning in the last kilometres. No doubt is very useful to have someone like Renshaw in front of you fighting for position and sorting out a good corridor from where to launch the attack, but a whole train?
I'm not saying he doesn't need a team. Team effort is what allowed him to be at the front, protecting him during the race, keeping the pace high and without a good team is almost impossible to win so consistently.

But I think Team Sky can rest easy in the knowledge that he would only need two or three guys on sprint days and not half the team which can be used to help Wiggins and Froome stay at the front of GC.
We will see more wins by the Manxman without the help of the whole squad, giving more space and opportunities to other riders to do separate work, or so I hope. Because I don't want to see the likes of HTC again, where a whole team of extremely talented riders are sacrificed for the glory of one.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

REACH OUT, TALK TO PEOPLE

I wanted to share what we did at the weekend in the hope to inspire other people to try what my partner and I ended up doing. A few days ago we were walking the dogs late in the afternoon and on the way back, in this big field, we noticed an elderly woman walking slowly leaning on her stick. We asked if she was ok as she seemed tentative and a little confused. The very first thing she said, almost without realising that's what she was going to say was: "You are the first people I've spoken to all day". Neither of us expected that so we stayed with her, chatting away for about 40 minutes. We ended up walking her back to her house, exchange numbers and invite her for a Sunday roast. She was going to be 89 a few days later and it seemed a nice thing to do. She was really touched as she didn't have it in her to cook a roast for herself (and she admitted she hated cooking).
Post a Comment
Read more

LA CLASSICISSIMA, A PREVIEW

As classics go, Milano-Sanremo is the longest of them all (almost 300km) and one of the oldest (1907). Eddy Merckx has won it a record 7 times. It has been marred by late snow at times and its route has been modified here and there, but at its core is the length and flatness, so one for the sprinters traditionally but not so much of late. There are a few lumps, but although short and not very steep, they usually come at the end of a long day on the saddle and have been decisive in the outcome of the race. In recent times, the climbs of Cipressa (added in 1982) and Poggio (added in 1960) have been the theatres of all-out attacks. The breakneck and twisty descent from the Poggio especially, induced some of the most entertaining racing... and some awful crashes too. The finish in the town of Sanremo has moved posts a few times but whether it was in the false flat of Via Roma or on the pan flat promenade by the sea, many a time it has ended in a bunch sprint.
Post a Comment
Read more

GIRO 2019 SO FAR - THE GOOD AND THE NOT SO GOOD

The Giro, like any Grand Tour, is a race of attrition, grit, resistance, luck and sheer determination that goes on for three weeks. The mental and physical demands are huge and some riders can deliver under this pressure. Others, albeit talented, crumble under the weight of expectation. So it is that every year it becomes a lottery for the lucky and the healthy and the fit. Results, or lack of, before the race is not always a good indicator. This article is not about Nibali, Roglic or Mollema, who are expected to do a good job as leaders and they have. This is about those athletes who have impressed the most or underperformed according to their skillsets (no comment on those who have left). THE GOOD RICHARD CARAPAZ (Movistar) Although 4th last year, the Ecuadorian tends to be quiet the rest of the season, so his rise in the general classification is never a given. He climbs faster than anyone else and his initial brief might have been to be Landa's right-hand man on the
Post a Comment
Read more