Skip to main content

A TALE OF TWO WORLDS

It seems to be the case with many World Championship races that there are two sides to the event, a positive and a negative. Positive side is an opportunity to see different teams with different dynamics from the trade teams, a race with tactical depth, a worthy winner... The negative was the venue and some riders' behaviour.

Ponferrada was not exciting in terms of the course and for the lack of support anywhere along the route. Wide nondescript drags and unattractive backdrop especially around the finish line (TT and Road races alike) and a very small presence of fans to cheer the riders. Even in the busiest section around the castle there were big gaps, which is shocking considering how many people turned up in Yorkshire for Tour de France or Belfast for the Giro. Spain is a cycling nation and their riders were amongst the favourites to win, which makes the lack of support even more difficult to understand... the bad weather? Come on, it was only a bit of rain.

However, races are mostly made interesting by the riders themselves, and in the end it was exciting to watch it unfold. Kudos have to go to the Polish and Italian teams. Italy was never going to be favourite with a below par Nibali, but they still tried to make the ride hard and chased down the breakaway. Most of the big teams did their turns at the front but in the end we all knew the decisive attack would come on the very last climb. Almost all the usual suspects tried but Kwiatkowski timed it to perfection, if anything most thought he had gone too soon, ok I did, given the long fast descent. But, as Strava showed later on, he was the fastest descender, and that sealed his fate.

While young Michal was taking every risk to get to the finish line first impersonating Mohoric in his crazy sit-on-top-tube style, Gilbert chased, dragging with him Gerrans, Gallopin, Van Avermaet, Valverde, Breschel (by the way, are the Worlds the only race he does?). Gilbert's face was a masterpiece of pain and determination, and had some of his companions helped taking in turns at the front, they might have succeeded in catching the Pole. But Gerrans, Valverde and even the Frenchman decided to play hide and seek behind Big G and jump him when he had nothing left to give to get a hollow medal. Hollow for the manner they took it. I don't normally have a problem with people's tactics and wheel sucking, sometimes it's called for by the tactics, but that's when the group is more or less together and there's enough gap to play cat and mouse. But in this instance it didn't look good. I'm pretty sure Harry Potter's invisibility cloak was deployed.

Never mind all that because in the end the winner was Kwiatkowski, a young rider (24) who only really burst into the scene this year winning National TT championship, Volta ao Algarve, Strade Bianche (beating Sagan of all people) and performed at the top level in many others. Cancellara didn't have the legs and the team (too small), partly I think he was confused by the splash of green in his jersey; Sagan confirmed his form needs re-tuning and motivation re-thinking; Team GB did the best they could and young Rowe, Swift and Kennaugh will soon fight it out for real.



When a 22 year old wins a World title, you know she's onto something good with her career. Ferrand Prevot timed her sprint superbly, first chasing down the 4 escapees, then accelerating to beat all others to the line. But, although young, she's not new to winning ways and not just on the road but with MTB and cyclo-cross. She has all the hallmarks of a Vos in the making.
Most of the race was not entertaining, but racing sometimes produces caging tactics, a big crash and the course didn't help either as it wasn't hard enough, as Lizzie Armitstead said in post-race interview. So the peloton stayed all together at a comparatively sedate pace until the last lap, when four of the best riders, Longo-Borghini, Vos, Armitstead and Johansson, pulled away and seemed to fight it out to the line. That is, until they decided that 5% chance was better than 25% and with 500 metres to go they waited for the chasers to catch up and past them. Inexplicably it became a bunch sprint and only Johansson from the 4 musketeers managed a medal.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REACH OUT, TALK TO PEOPLE

I wanted to share what we did at the weekend in the hope to inspire other people to try what my partner and I ended up doing. A few days ago we were walking the dogs late in the afternoon and on the way back, in this big field, we noticed an elderly woman walking slowly leaning on her stick. We asked if she was ok as she seemed tentative and a little confused. The very first thing she said, almost without realising that's what she was going to say was: "You are the first people I've spoken to all day". Neither of us expected that so we stayed with her, chatting away for about 40 minutes. We ended up walking her back to her house, exchange numbers and invite her for a Sunday roast. She was going to be 89 a few days later and it seemed a nice thing to do. She was really touched as she didn't have it in her to cook a roast for herself (and she admitted she hated cooking).

LA CLASSICISSIMA, A PREVIEW

As classics go, Milano-Sanremo is the longest of them all (almost 300km) and one of the oldest (1907). Eddy Merckx has won it a record 7 times. It has been marred by late snow at times and its route has been modified here and there, but at its core is the length and flatness, so one for the sprinters traditionally but not so much of late. There are a few lumps, but although short and not very steep, they usually come at the end of a long day on the saddle and have been decisive in the outcome of the race. In recent times, the climbs of Cipressa (added in 1982) and Poggio (added in 1960) have been the theatres of all-out attacks. The breakneck and twisty descent from the Poggio especially, induced some of the most entertaining racing... and some awful crashes too. The finish in the town of Sanremo has moved posts a few times but whether it was in the false flat of Via Roma or on the pan flat promenade by the sea, many a time it has ended in a bunch sprint.

GIRO 2019 SO FAR - THE GOOD AND THE NOT SO GOOD

The Giro, like any Grand Tour, is a race of attrition, grit, resistance, luck and sheer determination that goes on for three weeks. The mental and physical demands are huge and some riders can deliver under this pressure. Others, albeit talented, crumble under the weight of expectation. So it is that every year it becomes a lottery for the lucky and the healthy and the fit. Results, or lack of, before the race is not always a good indicator. This article is not about Nibali, Roglic or Mollema, who are expected to do a good job as leaders and they have. This is about those athletes who have impressed the most or underperformed according to their skillsets (no comment on those who have left). THE GOOD RICHARD CARAPAZ (Movistar) Although 4th last year, the Ecuadorian tends to be quiet the rest of the season, so his rise in the general classification is never a given. He climbs faster than anyone else and his initial brief might have been to be Landa's right-hand man on the